Jump to content

User talk:Phillip Dickinson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Phillip Dickinson, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

A tag has been placed on your article Adam Felman, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person, group of people, or band, but it does not indicate how or why he/she/they is/are notable. If you can indicate why Adam Felman is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Adam Felman. Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. You might also want to read our general biography criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert his/her/their notability, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable. Hynca-Hooley 13:32, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


A tag has been placed on your article Nicola Evans, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person, group of people, or band, but it does not indicate how or why he/she/they is/are notable. If you can indicate why Nicola Evans is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Nicola Evans. Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. You might also want to read our general biography criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert his/her/their notability, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable.---Marcus- 21:49, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I already deleted it. Good luck with the revolution. Academic Challenger 21:51, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It has to encyclopedic to be in Wikipedia, Funny text though! ---Marcus- 21:54, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it was very funny, and you both seem like great people, but she actually has to do something famous in order to get an article. Academic Challenger 21:56, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

I think I referred to non-encyclopedic, meaning that it wasn't material appropriate for Wikipedia. If you want to write humorous articles you should check out Uncyclopedia]! That's funny :] ---Marcus- 20:45, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]